For half a decade, Google, the maker of Android, the world’s most widely used phone software, has dreamed of making a best-selling phone that rivals the, the iPhone. phones have consistently received positive reviews but sell tepidly because of a significant weakness: They rely on off-the-shelf parts from other companies. As a result, they have felt sluggish compared with devices made by , which tightly controls the quality of its iPhones by doing design in-house. With the new Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro, which cost $600 and $900 and will be available on Thursday, field.
These are the company’s first phones to include Tensor, its computing processor, similar to how. enables the Pixel phones to perform complex computing tasks, like voice transcriptions, rapidly. After a week of testing, I concluded that Google had with the Pixels — but it is still dreaming. Its advancements were not enough to make me switch from an iPhone. The new Pixels feel zippy, but their computing power the iPhone’s speeds by as much as 50 percent. And while many photos produced with its camera looked clear and well-lit, some looked overly sharp. The Pixel 6’s ability to immediately translate languages into one’s native tongue also felt unfinished — it didn’t work well with some languages, like Japanese.
Here’s what you.
The Tensor processor results from Google’s long and expensive journey in smartphone technology, which included a $1 billion acquisition of the handset maker HTC in 2018. To speed things up, Google embedded its most complex algorithms into the chips, including advanced photography effects and language translation, eliminating the need to connect to its online servers to complete those tasks. The speed increases were noticeable. The Pixel 6’s motion looked buttery smooth compared to its predecessors when scrolling through . However, the results were mixed when I tested some of the phone’s noteworthy features, like watching a foreign-language into English in real-time.
When I openedgiving language lessons in French, Italian, and Japanese, the technology performed well with French and Italian. The software correctly translated informal ways to say “I am not” in French (pronounced “she pah” as opposed to the more formal phrase “Je ne suis pas”). But it struggled with the Japanese. One TikToker demonstrated an important conversation that, when correctly translated, meant the following in English: The Pixel 6’s translation came out like this: That translation probably would have earned a C in a Japanese language class. These results weren’t surprising. The Pixel software said that Japanese was in “beta for translated captions,” meaning it’s a work in progress. Another sign that this feature was incomplete is that I couldn’t captions for Mandarin speech, which I’m somewhat fluent in, because the Pixel has yet to support Chinese.
A Nice Camera That Sometimes Tries Too Hard
Pixel phones have always relied heavily on a blend of software, artificial intelligence, andto produce clear and vibrant photos. The Tensor chip, Google said, would help the camera software take pictures more quickly. To test the new cameras, I took the Pixel 6 devices and two of the latest iPhones to a park on an overcast day to shoot hundreds of photos of my corgi, Max (who now holds the record as the most featured dog in The New York Times). The Pixel 6 and 6 Pro’s , just as advertised, and many photos looked great, with realistic colors and excellent shadow detail.
Yet the Pixel 6 photos often looked like the phones were trying too hard with more advanced effects. In some pictures shot in “portrait” mode, which sharpens a subject in the foreground and gently blurs the background, my adorable dog looked overly sharpened to the point that he looked much older. The iPhone 13 extra effort. All told, the Pixel camera was excellent. Zoomed-in shots looked straightforward on the 6 Pro, the more expensive model with an lens. the ability to take photos in low light without a flash, and the new Pixels still excel in this area. I’d call it a tie when comparing them with low-light shots taken with the new iPhones., who is eight years old. Often, the colors of the Pixel 6 photos also looked too “cold,” making Max’s white mane appear blue. The camera software could adjust the color temperature, but the iPhone cameras generally produced photos with more natural colors without
Ultimately, the Pixel 6 and the Pixel 6 Pro are solid products. Considering their starting prices, about $200 lower than competing high-endand Apple, I recommend them to Android fans. But what will stand out? Not only are parts of the software unfinished, but the parts that the phone excels at aren’t all that special. For one, the ability to transcribe foreign languages is functional, but it’s something that older phones can do. When I like Thailand and Japan in years past, taxi drivers communicated with me by using Google’s Translate software — they spoke into their phones. They played the English translation out of the speaker. It worked with some delay, but it was adequate.
You might enjoy other benefits of Google’s shift to its silicon.than in past models — after each long day of testing, plenty of juice was still left by bedtime. But again, this is not a differentiator from other modern life. Over the years, Google has gone through several iterations of , and none have been as seamless and enjoyable to use as iMessage. Google’s competitors also have excellent exclusives. Most notably, iPhones have the “blue bubble” effect or iMessage. That special something sticky, delightful, and ubiquitously helpful — is what Google needs to deliver to get hordes of people to switch to a Pixel. to tell what that might be.