The WHO’s “prohibitionist” anti-vaping policy will lead to “more death and suffering from smoking”, according to more than 100 global experts. Over 100 international experts have slammed thefor a stubborn anti-vaping stance contributing to “millions” of avoidable smoking-related deaths. In an open letter ahead of a global tobacco control meeting , the group of independent nicotine science and policy experts blasted the WHO for being “dismissive of the potential to transform the tobacco market from high-risk to low-risk products”. “WHO is rejecting a strategy that could avoid millions of smoking-related deaths,” they write. The letter is addressed to the Parties to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) – a 2004 treaty negotiated under the auspices of the WHO with 168 signatories – ahead of the ninth conference of Parties starting on November 8.
“WHO has been running a prohibitionist campaign against tobacco harm reduction, even though tobacco harm reduction is part of its official policy … in the FCTC,” said Dr. Colin Mendelsohn, founding chair of the Australian Tobacco Harm Reduction Association and one of the three Australian signatories to the letter. Emeritus Professor Wayne Hall from the National Centre for Youth Substance Useof Queensland. The signatories are Dr. Alex Wodak, emeritus consultant at St Vincent’s Hospital, and the Australia21, think tank chair. Dr. Mendelsohn said the WHO “remains grossly and persistently misinformed about tobacco harm reduction and does not understand that it is displacing smoking” but that its approach was “influential”, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). “ to more death and suffering from smoking, especially in LMICs where most smoking deaths already occur,” Dr. Mendelsohn said.
WHO says kids targeted
There are currently an estimated one billion smokers globally, around 80 percent of whom live in LMICs. Tobacco is responsible foraboutd eightper year. In its 2021 tobacco in July, the WHO reiterated its opposition to e-cigarettes, citing the risk that children who use the products are up to three times more likely to use them in the future. “Nicotine is highly addictive. Electronic nicotine delivery systems are harmful and must be better regulated,” WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus .
“Where they are not banned, governments should adopt appropriate policies to protect their populations from the harms of electronic nicotine delivery systems and to prevent their uptake by children, adolescents, and other vulnerable groups.” As of the start of this, Australia has banned the importation of nicotine e-cigarettes after a “significant increase” in their use by young people. People can still the products if they have a prescription from their GP. According to the WHO’s report, 32 countries have banned the sale of e-cigarettes, and a further 79 have adopted at least one measure to clamp down on their sale, use, or promotion.
That still leaves 84 countries where they have not been regulated or restricted. Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the WHO’s Global Ambassador for Noncommunicable Diseases and Injuries, has campaigned against vaping. “More than oneworldwide still smoke,” Mr. Bloomberg said in July. “And as cigarette sales have fallen, tobacco – like e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products – and lobbied governments to limit their regulation. Their goal is simple – to hook another generation on nicotine. We can’t let that happen.”
‘Vaping much less harmful.’
In the letter to the WHO, which raises sevenand makes six recommendations, the experts called on the body to “modernize” its approach to tobacco policy. “Over the last decade, innovation in the tobacco and nicotine marketplace has meant there are now many nicotine products available that do not involve combustion of tobacco leaf and inhalation of smoke,” they write. “These smoke-free products include vaping products, novel oral nicotine pouches, heated tobacco products, and low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco, such as snus.”
They note that cigarettes and other smoked tobacco products are responsible for theof deaths caused by tobacco use globally and that smoke-free nicotine products “offer a promising route to reducing the harms arising from smoking”. “There is compelling evidence that smoke-free products are much less harmful than cigarettes and that they can displace smoking for individuals and at the population level,” they write.
They acknowledged “uncertainty about the benefits and risks” associated with the products and noted the tobacco industry’s involvement. “However, we must also consider the substantial body of evidence we have and not allow excessive caution or residual uncertainties to deny smokers promising options to switch away from the combustible products that we know with certainty are lethal,” they said.
Q&A full of ‘misinformation.’
, the WHO was accused of running a “misleading” Q&A full of “blatant misinformation” about electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), more commonly known as e-cigarettes. In the Q&A, the WHO warned that “both tobacco products and ENDS pose health risks” and that “the safest approach is not to use either”. “The WHO has a history of anti-vaping activism . This document is particularly malign,” Professor Peter Hajek, director of the Tobacco Dependence Research of London, said.
“Practically all the factual statements in it are wrong. There is no evidence that vaping is ‘highly addictive’ – less than 1 percent of non-smokers become regular vapers. Vaping does not lead young people to smoke – smoking among young people is at [an]. “There is no evidence that vaping increases the or could affect bystanders’ health. The US outbreak of lung injuries is due to contaminants in illegal marijuana cartridges and has nothing to do with nicotine vaping. There is clear evidence that e-cigarettes help smokers quit.
“The authors of this document should take responsibility for using blatant misinformation that is likely to prevent smokers from switching to a much less risky alternative.” Professor John Britton, director of the UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies and Consultant in Respiratory Medicine at the University of Nottingham, said the WHO document was “misleading on several counts”. “It implies that vaping nicotine was the cause of the 2019 USwhen it was vaping cannabis products,” he said.
“It says that there is no substantial evidence that vaping is an don’t know when they are less harmful. In these ways alone, the WHO misrepresents the available scientific evidence.” They were published initially as Global experts call on the World Health Organisation to Ditch a ‘Prohibitionist’ anti-vaping Stance.of quitting smoking when there is clinical trial evidence of the highest standard demonstrating that vaping is more effective than the nicotine replacement therapies that the WHO endorses. “It responds to whether e-cigarettes are more dangerous than tobacco cigarettes by suggesting that we